Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3451 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8320 - 216 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €293 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KS | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |