Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1729 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 1600X - 152 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - €231.18 vs €343.21
- Up to 19% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-12900 - €1.83 vs €2.26 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €343.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12961 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
126
82%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12962 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |