Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900T outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900T is 2835 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900T
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-9590 - 183 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-11900T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900T | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
