Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700K - 150 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €188.88 vs €292.01
- Up to 27% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900K - €1.42 vs €1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 91 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
72%
Price, €
€292.01
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €292.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3298 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
133
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |