Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6300 - 187 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €38.99 vs €281.8
- Up to 85% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-11900K - €0.23 vs €1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
15%
Price, €
€281.8
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €281.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |