Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €248.88 vs €606.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900KS - €1.08 vs €2.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Core i9-11900F - 276 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
230
83%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€248.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
49%
Price, €
€606.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €606.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |