Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G6900 - 377 vs 355 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €73.76 vs €278.66
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €278.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74707 minutes ago
Buy for €73.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74707 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
73.83694150161216%
Multi-Core
2696
29.39701232144804%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |