Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 896 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 71 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 48 vs 16 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€278.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €278.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54542 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
56.886227544910184%
Multi-Core
7407
80.76545632973503%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 48 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |