Buy on Amazon
€1,336.05
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 284 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-9400F - 160 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 36 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - €158.88 vs €1336.05
- Up to 88% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10980XE - €1.01 vs €8.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 65 vs 165 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.35/FPS
12%
Price, €
€1336.05
11%
FPS Winner
Processore Intel Core i9 i9-10980XE Octadeca-core (18 Core) 3 GHz - 24,75 MB di cache - Velocità di overclock 4,60 GHz - 14 nm - 165 W - 36 thread
Buy for €1,336.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
158
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-9400F processore 2,9 GHz Box 9 MB Smart Cache
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 6 |
36 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
