Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 2330 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4670 - 134 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - €26.41 vs €1336.05
- Up to 98% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10980XE - €0.21 vs €9.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 84 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.97/FPS
2%
Price, €
€1336.05
1%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,336.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
127
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 4 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |