Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 779 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 131 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 36 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - €379.64 vs €1336.05
- Up to 70% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10980XE - €3.09 vs €10.2 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.2/FPS
30%
Price, €
€1336.05
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,336.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
123
93%
Value, €/FPS
€3.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 8 |
36 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |