Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 808 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10920X - 194 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - €158.83 vs €1263.69
- Up to 88% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10920X - €0.82 vs €6.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,263.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17417 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €158.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17417 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |