Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3770 - 603 vs 469 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €158.88 vs €349.57
- Up to 41% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900KF - €0.34 vs €0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
603
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
58%
Price, €
€349.57
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17908 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
469
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17907 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |