Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-4670 - 136 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €26.55 vs €349.57
- Up to 91% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900KF - €0.22 vs €2.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.57/FPS
8%
Price, €
€349.57
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
123
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €26.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |