Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4150 - 183 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €19.0 vs €349.57
- Up to 94% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900KF - €0.12 vs €1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.91/FPS
6%
Price, €
€349.57
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |