Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Valorant than Core i3-4130T - 817 vs 724 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €30.28 vs €349.57
- Up to 91% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-10900KF - €0.04 vs €0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
817
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
9%
Price, €
€349.57
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
724
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |