Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 224% better in League of Legends than Celeron G3900 - 217 vs 67 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €60.9 vs €312.86
- Up to 37% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-10900KF - €0.91 vs €1.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
63%
Price, €
€312.86
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €312.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |