Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i9-10900K - 205 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €276.66 vs €763.04
- Up to 64% better value when playing Control than Core i9-10900K - €1.33 vs €3.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
99.02439024390245%
Value, €/FPS
€3.68/FPS
36.141304347826086%
Price, €
€763.04
36%
Buy for €763.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€276.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €276.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1749
80.56195301704284%
Multi-Core
9163
99.9127685094319%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |