Buy on Amazon
€763.04
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than Core i5-2400S - 182 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €31.97 vs €763.04
- Up to 95% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-10900K - €0.19 vs €4.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.19/FPS
4.534606205250596%
Price, €
€763.04
4%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900K processor 3.7 GHz 20 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €763.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
168
92.3076923076923%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.97
100%
Value Winner
CPU Intel Core i5-2400S Processore Desktop 4-Core 4-Thread Usato 2,5 GHz 6M 65W LGA1155
Buy for €31.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
28.359062321326473%
Multi-Core
1352
14.754992906253412%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
