Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2110 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4160 - 194 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€763.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €763.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15006 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
60.834762721555165%
Multi-Core
2072
22.61268143621085%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |