Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i9-10900K vs Core i3-3240

Core i9-10900K vs Core i3-3240: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900K

3.7 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900K Logo
Intel BX8070110900K Core i9-10900K (fase base: 3,70GHz; attacco: LGA1200; 125 Watt) Box

Buy for 515 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10639 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i3-3240

3.4 GHz | 2-core

Intel Core i3-3240 Logo
BQTEC Intel Core i3-3240 3.40 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processore LGA 1155

Buy for 23 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10639 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900K

3.7 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900K Logo
Intel BX8070110900K Core i9-10900K (fase base: 3,70GHz; attacco: LGA1200; 125 Watt) Box

Buy for 515 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10639 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i3-3240

3.4 GHz | 2-core

Intel Core i3-3240 Logo
BQTEC Intel Core i3-3240 3.40 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processore LGA 1155

Buy for 23 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10639 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K

  • Performs up to 11% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-3240 - 503 vs 454 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 20 vs 4 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240

  • Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €23.0 vs €515.0
  • Up to 95% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-10900K - €0.05 vs €1.02 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
This is a free version of DOOM Eternal.
DOOM Eternal

DOOM Eternal

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Nightmare

Intel Core i9-10900K Logo
Core i9-10900K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

503

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.02/FPS

4%

Price, €

€515

4%

FPS Winner

Intel BX8070110900K Core i9-10900K (fase base: 3,70GHz; attacco: LGA1200; 125 Watt) Box

Buy for 515 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10639 minutes ago

Intel Core i3-3240 Logo
Core i3-3240

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012


FPS

454

90%

Value, €/FPS

€0.05/FPS

100%

Price, €

€23

100%

Value Winner

BQTEC Intel Core i3-3240 3.40 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processore LGA 1155

Buy for 23 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10639 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Nightmare

Intel Core i9-10900K Logo
Core i9-10900K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Intel Core i3-3240 Logo
Core i3-3240

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i9-10900K Logo
Core i9-10900K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1749

100%

Multi-Core

9163

100%

Intel Core i3-3240 Logo
Core i3-3240

Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

554

31%

Multi-Core

1137

12%

Intel Core i9-10900K Logo

Intel Core i9-10900K

vs
Intel Core i3-3240 Logo

Intel Core i3-3240

Apr 30th, 2020
Release DateSep 3rd, 2012
Core i9CollectionCore i3
Comet LakeCodenameIvy Bridge
Intel Socket 1200SocketIntel Socket 1155
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
10
Cores2
20
Threads4
3.7 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.4 GHz
5.3 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
125 WTDP
55 W
14 nm
Process Size22 nm
37.0x
Multiplier34.0x
UHD Graphics 630Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 2500
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.