Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1213 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 362 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
362
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€515
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |