Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 704 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 4100 - 64 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4100
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €65.79 vs €747.21
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €747.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 302 minutes ago
Buy for €65.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1484
84.84848484848484%
Multi-Core
4702
51.31507148313871%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |