Buy on Amazon
€763.04
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 142% better in Diablo IV than FX-4300 - 225 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €24.38 vs €763.04
- Up to 92% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-10900K - €0.26 vs €3.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.39/FPS
7.669616519174041%
Price, €
€763.04
3%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900K processor 3.7 GHz 20 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €763.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
93
41.333333333333336%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.38
100%
Value Winner
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX-4300 FX 4300 Processore CPU Quad-Core da 3,8 GHz FD4300WMW4MHK Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €24.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
