Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Core i7-2600S - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €77.34 vs €288.88
- Up to 72% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10900F - €0.53 vs €1.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
28%
Price, €
€288.88
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
145
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |