Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-4690S - 301 vs 287 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €70.78 vs €288.88
- Up to 74% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-10900F - €0.25 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
301
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
26%
Price, €
€288.88
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
287
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4690S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |