Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F and the cheaper Core i3-10300 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-10300 - 181 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €110.06 vs €272.66
- Up to 59% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - €0.62 vs €1.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
41.05960264900662%
Price, €
€272.66
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1597 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
98.34254143646409%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1597 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1565
93.37708830548927%
Multi-Core
4795
56.90719202468549%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |