Buy on Amazon
€288.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2985 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6200 - 161 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-10900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core fino a 5,2 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 3 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
