Buy on Amazon
€359
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4690 - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €108.66 vs €359.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900 - €0.86 vs €2.62 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.62/FPS
32.82442748091603%
Price, €
€359
30%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 processor 2.8 GHz 20 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
127
92.7007299270073%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-4690, BX80646I54690 Processore
Buy for €108.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
69.8943661971831%
Multi-Core
3303
39.22337014606342%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
