Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 157 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 172 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 64 vs 20 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€542.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €542.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
20 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |