Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 13 days older than Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10850K - 194 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 64 vs 20 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €439.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
95.11494252873564%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
20 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |