Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 559 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-10320 - 229 vs 227 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - €151.33 vs €318.88
- Up to 52% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i7-9700K - €0.67 vs €1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
48%
Price, €
€318.88
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
227
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |