Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2146 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1610 - 248 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - €88.88 vs €318.88
- Up to 67% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-9700K - €0.43 vs €1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
248
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
33%
Price, €
€318.88
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
206
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |