Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1695 days newer than Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-5820K - 183 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€422.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €422.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
74.88702388637832%
Multi-Core
5443
87.00447570332481%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |