Key Differences
In short — Core i7-965 outperforms Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-965 is 1386 days older than Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-3220T - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
94.43298969072164%
Multi-Core
941
55.91206179441473%
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i3 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
