Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4620 days newer than Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-950 - 205 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 58 vs 130 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €80.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Single-Core
463
20.808988764044944%
Multi-Core
1569
21.040632962317286%
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 58 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |