Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3602 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-940XM - 125 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 20 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€450
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7420 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |