Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 4482 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 33% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-940XM - 207 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 20 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€262.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €262.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10277 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |