Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3922 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 65% better in Starfield than Core i7-940XM - 71 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |