Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i7-930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3416 days newer than Core i7-930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-930
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-930 - 212 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-930 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-930 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-930
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-930
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Single-Core
416
39.543726235741445%
Multi-Core
1424
47.26186525058081%
Intel Core i7-930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
