Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 4192 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-920XM - 213 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65818 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Single-Core
422
21.519632840387555%
Multi-Core
1128
14.826498422712934%
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |