Key Differences
In short — Core i7-880 outperforms Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-880 is 827 days older than Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Core i3-3220T - 45 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
88.07692307692308%
Multi-Core
941
56.92679975801573%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
