Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3466 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 37% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-875K - 194 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 48 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
30.53389322135573%
Multi-Core
1761
13.22369903131336%
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
