Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1123 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 179 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700K - 24 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
