Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 1211 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 133 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
