Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-870 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-870 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-870.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €182.45 vs €288.88
- Up to 27% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900F - €1.27 vs €1.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-870 - 167 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-870 - 20 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
144
86%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
73%
Price, €
€288.88
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-870 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |