Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7820X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 480 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - €129.0 vs €438.88
- Up to 70% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900K - €0.98 vs €3.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-7820X - 136 vs 131 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
131
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11975 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.23/FPS
30%
Price, €
€438.88
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €438.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11975 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |