Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1142 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Core i5-4460 - 201 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €64.79 vs €129.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-7820X - €0.33 vs €0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 84 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16364 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
196
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16363 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |