Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1707 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than FX-8300 - 267 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €80.56 vs €129.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-7820X - €0.34 vs €0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16934 minutes ago
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |