Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 952 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €182.66 vs €441.88
- Up to 56% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9900KF - €1.07 vs €2.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6900K - 182 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12868 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.43/FPS
44%
Price, €
€441.88
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €441.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12867 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |